Craig Wright Found Not Liable for Breach of Kleiman Business Partnership
A jury ruled Wright must pay $100 million to W&K Info Defense Research but cleared him of all other charges.
MIAMI – A federal jury found that Craig Wright, the Australian who claims to have invented Bitcoin, didn’t have a business partnership with deceased Florida computer forensics expert Dave Kleiman, but he does owe $100 million in compensatory damages for conversion to a company Kleiman founded in Florida, W&K Info Defense Research.
“I feel remarkably happy and vindicated,” Wright said in the courtroom hallway after the verdict was announced. “I am not a fraud, and I never have been.” He added that he had offered Kleiman’s estate, represented by Dave’s brother Ira Kleiman, “12 million many years ago, which if he had taken that then in bitcoin, when bitcoin was $200, and he kept it – you can do the math.”
Wright testified that he was friends with Dave Kleiman and that Kleiman helped him edit a white paper that explained the foundation of Bitcoin, but he insisted the two weren’t business partners. Dave Kleiman died in 2013, and his brother brought the federal civil lawsuit on behalf of Dave Kleiman’s estate and W&K.
Of the verdict against W&K, Wright said it means that “I owe my ex-wife more money.” He was referring to the fact that Ira Kleiman’s control of W&K is being challenged in court in Palm Beach County, where Wright’s ex-wife, Lynn Wright, and current wife, Ramona Watts (she filed as Ramona Ang), each claim to control a third of W&K and are suing Ira Kleiman, alleging he didn’t have authority to bring the federal suit. Those cases have been on hold pending the outcome of the federal suit.
The jury wasn’t asked to decide on the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. Both sides in the suit based the suit on the assumption that Wright was either entirely or partly responsible for the creation of the cryptocurrency, with Wright’s defense stating he alone created Bitcoin and Kleiman’s side arguing that it was a partnership between Wright and Dave Kleiman. Wright’s claims to be Satoshi, however, have been widely discredited and none of them was tested in court.
Vel Freedman, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said his team, too, was happy with the verdict: “We just won $100 million!”
It was far short of what he had asked for: up to $36 billion for the value of bitcoin in dispute, $126 billion for intellectual property and $17 billion in punitive damages.
With his fellow attorneys, Kyle Roche and Andrew Brenner, Freedman issued the following statement:
During the jury’s fifth week in the courtroom, it decided Wright and Dave Kleiman weren’t in a business partnership, and thus the plaintiffs aren’t owed a portion of the partnership’s assets, which the plaintiffs believe to include about 1.1 million BTC and intellectual property such as software.
The jury did rule that Wright owes W&K Info Defense Research $100 million for intellectual property, but didn’t define what intellectual property it believed Wright converted. Over the course of the trial, both the plaintiffs and Wright’s defense team described a variety of projects, including “testnet bitcoins” and white papers on subjects, including hard drives and supercomputers, as intellectual property owned by W&K.
The jury was asked to consider damages in both bitcoin and dollars, but chose to award the $100 million in damages in fiat currency alone, writing “0 BTC” on the line for bitcoin damages.
Conversion is a form of theft that involves taking unauthorized control of another’s property.
The jurors were asked to evaluate whether they believed:
- Wright was liable to Dave Kleiman’s estate for breach of a business partnership;
- whether Wright was liable to the estate for conversion;
- whether Wright was liable to W&K (the joint venture) for conversion;
- whether the plaintiffs proved their case for civil theft;
- whether Wright was liable for fraud to the plaintiffs;
- whether Wright was liable for breach of fiduciary duty to W&K; and
- whether Wright was liable for unjust enrichment against the plaintiffs.
Ultimately, the jury found Wright not liable for the majority of the charges.
‘Depressing’ outcome for Kleiman
Ira Kleiman wasn’t in the courtroom today but told CoinDesk last week as the case dragged on, “I’m depressed. We thought they would return a favorable verdict in a day.”
Ira Kleiman is a quiet man who has largely avoided the press, while Wright has a host of supporters who are active online. Feeling that his side of the story had been drowned out, Ira Kleiman added a section to the website DaveKleiman.com highlighting details from exhibits in his court case that he hoped readers would see.
That included emails Craig Wright wrote to various people, saying things like, “Dave Kleiman and I started mining in 2009. So we have a few things that will interest them. It is a shame Dave died last year before fruition, but all is moving ahead”; “I was not the person doing the mining. Dave was.”; and “Satoshi was a team. Without the other part of the team, he died.”
Ira Kleiman was frustrated that given such pronouncements, the jury hadn’t easily found in his favor.
His own lawyers, however, had spent much of the trial insisting that Wright forged and backdated documents – a position backed up by a magistrate judge overseeing the case before the trial began in November.
In August 2019, Bruce Reinhart, the judge, issued a sanctions order against Wright, stating:
“The evidence establishes that he has engaged in a willful and bad faith pattern of obstructive behavior, including submitting incomplete or deceptive pleadings, filing a false declaration, knowingly producing a fraudulent trust document, and giving perjurious testimony at the evidentiary hearing.”
The sanctions order was vacated by U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom, the presiding judge, before the trial began.
Wright’s defense team accused plaintiffs of “cherry-picking,” presenting the documents that fit their narrative as legitimate and others as forged.
It was clear the jurors were uncomfortable making decisions in the case. On Wednesday they said they couldn’t agree on any of the counts, but Bloom directed them to continue deliberating.
Wright told CoinDesk last week that Ira Kleiman would have trouble collecting any verdict awarded to W&K, as his ex-wife and an entity tied to him own two-thirds of the company – a matter that is being litigated in court in Palm Beach County.
BSV, the offshoot of bitcoin Craig Wright is involved in, rallied as much as 13% Monday following the resolution of the Kleiman case.
Catch up on the trial here:
UPDATE (Dec. 6, 2021, 18:06 UTC): Updated with additional context, including BSV price movement.
UPDATE (Dec. 6, 2021, 18:23 UTC): Updated with additional context, including a revised statement from the plaintiff’s legal team.
UPDATE (Dec. 6, 2021, 18:35 UTC): Updated with additional context on the background of the case.
The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.
Learn more about Consensus 2023, CoinDesk’s longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.