The co-founder of Ethereum’s best-known coin mixing service says that privacy protocols are defending people’s rights to financial privacy.
In an interview with CoinDesk, co-founder Roman Semenov said the team has little control over what its users do with the protocol as it's designed to be autonomous and outside of the control of developers.
“There is not much we can do in terms of helping investigations because the team doesn't have much control over the protocol,” he told CoinDesk. “The Tornado Cash team mostly does research and publishes the code to GitHub. All the deployments, protocol changes and important decisions are made by the community via Tornado Governance DAO and deployment ceremonies," an event when new code is pushed live.
The way the protocol is designed, decentralized and autonomous much like decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, means there’s nobody in charge. There’s no corporate office, executive team or CEO where the buck stops. Semenov said there’s no backend, and the user interface comes from an Ethereum Name Service domain – a service that represents Ethereum addresses as familiar-sounding domain names.
“The protocol was specifically designed this way to be unstoppable, because it wouldn't make much sense if some third party [like developers] would have control over it. This would be the same as if someone had control over Bitcoin or Ethereum,” he told CoinDesk.
Is Tornado Cash part of a criminal conspiracy?
Tornado Cash isn’t the first service to offer users the ability to mix, or tumble, their crypto. These have been around since the beginning of blockchain technology, with development efforts increasing in parallel to the ubiquity of darknet markets like Silk Road or Alpha Bay.
Law enforcement is very familiar with mixers. Bill Callahan, a retired U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency agent and now director of government affairs at the Blockchain Intelligence Group, told CoinDesk in a prior interview that he doesn’t think Tornado Cash is laundering money, equating it to running away from the police and trying to evade capture. But there would be grounds to investigate it as part of the scheme.
“If a mixer knows or maybe should have known, taken steps to know the source of the funds and the beneficial owner, and the funds are from an illicit source, they would be investigated as part of the money-laundering scheme. They could also be charged as an accessory to the crime in a criminal conspiracy,” he told CoinDesk.
In a previous statement to CoinDesk, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) said mixers like Tornado Cash may fall under the definition of a money transmitter, and therefore have “obligations” set by the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). But it hasn’t given any further guidance.
With the high-profile takedown of darknet bitcoin mixing service Helix, then-U.S. Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski said that “[obscuring] virtual currency transactions in this way is a crime.”
However, Larry Dean Harmon, the service’s operator, pled guilty and the prosecution never had to prove its case, meaning there isn’t precedent that can say with certainty that this is money laundering.
For its part, Tornado Cash’s Semenov said law enforcement hasn’t been in touch.
“Law enforcement usually knows that the developers don't have any ability to assist with an investigation or change the protocol,” he told CoinDesk.
Instead, Semenov said law enforcement would spend its time obtaining logs from infrastructure providers like Cloudflare or Infura, as these could be tied to IP addresses. Law enforcment would also likely look at any addresses linked to a centralized crypto exchange, where the wallet would have customer details linked to it via the know-your-customer (KYC) process.
“Law enforcement very rarely tries to contact us directly,” he said.
Privacy vs. security
Semenov downplayed any ideas that the protocol is a tool for criminals and said it's an important mechanism to protect the safety of crypto traders as the blockchain reveals everything for all to see.
“Since all their crypto portfolio is visible to the public, the holders of significant amounts of crypto are very vulnerable to becoming victims of kidnapping, torture and blackmail,” Semenov told CoinDesk in an interview. “We think that it's a very serious threat, and the privacy protocols are very important to ensure their personal safety. The banks don't disclose your personal holdings to anyone who asks, and we think it should be the same way with crypto.”
Semenov said the debate about the limits of digital privacy isn’t anything new. It has always flared up any time new encryption technology has become available to retail users.
“In the 1990s, the government claimed that no strong encryption should be available to people at all, arguing that it would help terrorism,” he said. “In the late 2000s, there was a similar fight over end-to-end encryption in messengers where people were defending their right to private communication.”
Now, in the 2010s and 2020’s, crypto is this latest frontier, and Semenov said his efforts in defending people’s right to financial privacy are the “continuation of the same story that started a long time ago.”
He added, “Can you imagine the world where the cypherpunks conceded from the start and we wouldn't even have HTTPS encryption of our web communications?”
The leader in news and information on cryptocurrency, digital assets and the future of money, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups. As part of their compensation, certain CoinDesk employees, including editorial employees, may receive exposure to DCG equity in the form of stock appreciation rights, which vest over a multi-year period. CoinDesk journalists are not allowed to purchase stock outright in DCG.